This is a letter from [Gunnery]Sergeant Krueger, USMC, to Speaker Pelosi.  This says it all: How can you even think of pushing forward legislation to set a withdrawal date for US forces from Iraq? Do you know how much you embolden the insurgency here in Iraq? YOU ARE JEOPARDIZING THE LIVES OF US SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN WITH YOUR ACTIONS. You and your fellow Democrats are causing the Al Qaeda supported insurgency to use more catastrophic attacks against us and Iraqi forces . . . . You will have to live with yourself and try to sleep at night knowing ...

Last week, our man Jeffy wondered whether Speaker Nancy Pelosi's snuggling up to Syria's state terrorist President Assad was an act of Treason, by violating Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution, by giving "aid and comfort to the enemy." Not a bad question. But what ever happened to the Logan Act allegations? The Logan Act, 15 U.S.C Section 953 expressly prohibits U.S. citizens to conduct foreign policy of the United States without authority . Here is the statute: § 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments. Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with ...

"Our troops... deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them."      - George W. Bush, November 11, 2005 Which elected leaders was W. talking about? You may be surprised at some of names that made the list:

Mac Owens, a military historian and professor of national security affairs at the Naval War College, has dubbed the escalation in defeatist rhetoric by the Dems as the "Reid Surge." And just as ideas have consequences, words do as well. Over at National Review Online, Owens writes: "Our enemies know that the war that counts is the one for the American mind. If we believe that the war is lost, they win. They have an incentive to keep fighting and to kill as many people as they can. In a gun battle ...

This is just great:  Nancy Pelosi is threatening to sue the President if he issues a signing statement  on the Iraq war spending bill.  Pelosi recently told a group of libs, "We can take the President to court" if he issues a signing statement, according to the liberal website dailykos.com. This is the same woman who cozied up to the President of Syria three weeks ago.  Yes, Syria, a leading sponsor of terrorism and a country known to be supplying men and material to kill American soldiers in Iraq. She offers the hand of friendship to Assad and the back of her hand to the Leader of the Free World. Impeach Reid and Pelosi!

"Who then is this, that he commands even winds and water, and they obey him?"      - Luke 8:25, ESV As if on cue, just days after a tornado devastated Greensburg, Kansas, Democrats have rushed to blame George W. Bush for this natural disaster. On her blog, Pelosi actually links the war in Iraq to the destruction caused in, ahem, Kansas. She writes, "The war in Iraq has had a serious impact on the National Guard and its ability to protect and assist Americans in times of disaster here at home. On Friday May 4th, a massive tornado ripped through the town of Greensburg, Kansas killing at least 10 people and leaving the town in ruins."...

She can't pass legislation to benefit our troops but Speaker Nancy Pelosi can propose pork that will benefit her husband. Our Lady of San Francisco has included a provision in a water redevelopment bill that just happens to make substantial waterfront improvements in an area where her husband owns four commercial buildings. John Hart, a spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said that "on its face it appears to be a conflict of interest." Pelosi's project was part of the $15 billion Water Resources Development Act that passed the House April 19 by 394-25 and pays for hundreds of projects around the country.

While the American Military is striking fear into the hearts (as well as the hides) of the terrorists in Iraq, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are striking fear into the hearts of . . . the Iraqi people. W. Thomas Smith, Jr., a former U.S. Marine infantry leader, is doing some of the best reporting on Iraq over at National Review Online.  Smith says that on his last visit, the average Iraqi was incredibly grateful for the presence of their liberators:  "It was the same everywhere I went. The Iraqis of all stripes, talked — so long as they knew I would not publish their names (to do so would make them and their families a target of the terrorists) — and expressed gratitude toward ...

It has apparently been a while since Nancy Pelosi shook the dust of her Bible. In her "I'm-the-President-Too!" press release on the National Day of Prayer this past week, New Testament Nancy said this: “In its call to action, the Gospel of John says: 'Dear children, let us love not in word or speech, but in deed and in truth.' Today, let us commit that our prayers will also turn into action – acting out God’s love for all people, traditions, and faiths of the world." You will search quite a while to find this phrase in the Gospel of John. The verse is actually found in 1 John 3:18, which is about a hundred pages ...

One of the mantras that has been repeated over and over again since the elections last November is that the "voters have sent a message to President Bush." The logic goes something like this: Democrats bashed Bush and the war in Iraq relentlessly, declaring early and often that they were opposed to both. The Democrats got elected. Therefore, the American populace is opposed to Bush and the war in Iraq. Obviously there are some gaping holes in that logic, including the fact that the ballots listed candidate names, not policy positions on a single issue. Having said that, let's just suppose for a moment that voters, as a group, really did intend to send a message to the White House when they cast their ballots. Just because voters allegedly want something, does that make it the best option? Obviously not. If Americans voted to liquidate the public school system and use the proceeds to fund an effort to build a swimming pool in every American's back yard, would that make it a good idea? And yet, leaders like Reid and Pelosi continue the drum beat. "We're not going to stop until we surrender. Why? 'Cuz The People said so!" This sandy moral-high ground has become the platform from which they thumb their noses at the President. They decry the arrogance of this administration, lamenting just how out of touch Bush is. In considering this supposed referendum of the people, I wondered if Reid and Pelosi had always been so dedicated to serving at the whim of their constituency. I did some digging regarding another hot-button political issue: same-sex marriage.