A few questions I've been pondering regarding the plot to blow up JFK airport (note: JFK is IN NEW YORK CITY): Why would the NY Times repeatedly downplay the danger of this plot? If the old adage that "If it bleeds, it leads" is still true, why would a news outlet tell us that the story they are reporting isn't much of a story at all? Speaking of downplaying the story, why would the NY Times bury this story on page 30, in the "NY Metro" section? Instead, they ran stories on the front page under headlines of "A legal debate in Guantanamo on boy fighters” and "President’s push on immigration tests GOP base.” If someone was planning ...